by The Cranky Media Guy!
Thurs. Nov. 2
A Letter, A Reply And Some New Stuff
You're about to lose me as a fan.
I'm an independent voter, probably Nader. But your weasel rant
against the Republicans is a bit off. I counted the slanted ads,
including the NAACP "Bush Killed James Bird" ad - which is still
running, the "Daisy Ad" (which is gone, ran only in a couple of
markets), Ed Asner's "Bush hates old people" phone message, the
"Bush is Killing my Children" phone message, etc.
I find the Dems way way way ahead of the Reps. And this hooey
the Dems are pushing, "A vote for Nader is a vote for Bush"!!!!!
Did I have a lobotomy while I slept? I'd say the slop-slinging
is about 75-25 Dems. You used to be a lot less one-sided.
Regards
Larey Kerling Fort Collins CO
Dear Larry:
Gee, we disagree once and you're gonna bail on me? Sheesh.
If you go back and reread what I wrote, I did say that the Democrats
were pretty sleazy, too, but I thought the Republicans were just
a wee bit ahead of them in that department. I should have made
it clear that I was thinking historically as much as currently.
I mean, there was that whole Watergate thing. Let's remember,
too, that the Republicans are the party that claims to be the
proponents of Christian values, etc. Calling yourself that while
slinging mud just makes you a hypocrite.
Trust me, Larry, I'm not about to become an apologist for
the Democrats. I've never been a fan of the GOP, but I'm totally
disgusted with the Democrats for the way they've totally abandoned
their traditional base of union-types in their pedal-to-the-medal
race to become pseudo "conservatives". Screw 'em. I'm
with you on Nader, Larry.
Yours,
CMG
You'll Like This, Larry
As if to make Larry's argument for him, it came out this week
that the Democrats have had a nasty little "unofficial"
whispering campaign going on. You know that pesky Ralph Nader
guy, the one who's threatening to take away enough votes to make
that human fence post Al Gore lose the election? Well, he's 65
and he's never been married. And we all know what that
means. Don't we? Nudge nudge, wink wink.
In case the incredible subtlety of this sleazy shit escapes you,
they're trying to say that Nader is gay. Apparently, that's supposed
to be a bad thing. Now, remember that it's the party that allegedly
supports gay rights pulling this crap. Gee, was I saying something
about hypocrisy just a moment ago?
If the Democratic candidate, a sitting vice-president during
a time of alleged "prosperity", is so weak that his
supporters have to resort to nasty shit like fag-baiting to help
him, he deserves to lose. Maybe if they get their ass kicked next
Tuesday, the Democrats will realize that American doesn't need
two essentially identical parties, Republican and Republican Lite.
Oh, in case you're wondering, Ralph said, "In response to
the implication, the answer is no." Not that there would
be anything wrong with it, of course. Nyuk nyuk.
The BEST stories are the ones you report -- News items may be
sent to bob@crankymediaguy.com
Old News:
10-26 | 10-19
| 10-12 |
10-05 | 9-28
| 9-21 | 9-14 | 9-07 | 8-31 | 8-24 | 8-17 | 8-10 | 8-03 | 7-27 | 7-20 | 7-13 | 7-06 | 6-22 | 6-29 |